XM Cyber
![XM Cyber Logo XM Cyber Logo](/files/vendor/xm-cyber667ed58188f08_1.jpg)
Overview
HQ Location
Israel
|
Year Founded
2016
|
Company Type
Private
|
Revenue
$10-100m
|
Employees
201 - 1,000
|
Website
|
Twitter Handle
|
Company Description
XM Cyber, a Schwarz Group Company, is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Its award-winning Exposure Management platform lets you continuously see your on-prem and cloud networks through the eyes of an attacker and spot attacks before they happen.
IoT Snapshot
XM Cyber is a provider of Industrial IoT platform as a service (paas), and cybersecurity and privacy technologies, and also active in the construction and infrastructure, finance and insurance, healthcare and hospitals, and national security and defense industries.
Technologies
Use Cases
Functional Areas
Industries
Services
Technology Stack
XM Cyber’s Technology Stack maps XM Cyber’s participation in the platform as a service (paas), and cybersecurity and privacy IoT Technology stack.
-
Devices Layer
-
Edge Layer
-
Cloud Layer
-
Application Layer
-
Supporting Technologies
Technological Capability:
None
Minor
Moderate
Strong
Supplier missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new supplier profile for your business.
Case Studies.
Case Study
Securing IT Infrastructure of Europe’s Largest Seaports: A Case Study of Hamburg Port Authority
The Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), responsible for managing all harbor-related infrastructure for the city of Hamburg, faced significant challenges in securing its vast IT infrastructure. This infrastructure included 350 kilometers of fiber cable, 850 routers and switches, 500 servers in two data centers, and thousands of computers and smartphones running over 600 applications across 63 separate locations. The HPA IT managers identified several security challenges, including over 100 local administrators managing applications without support or follow-up, applications without a designated owner responsible for security or lifecycle management, and a flat network structure focused more on performance and flexibility than security. Additionally, HPA workers were not optimally aware of best security practices, leading to concerns about unidentified network exposures.
Case Study
Enhancing Cybersecurity Risk Management: A Case Study of Plymouth Rock
Plymouth Rock Assurance, a leading US insurance firm, has been serving the insurance needs of its American clients for nearly 40 years. Specializing in auto and homeowner’s insurance, the Plymouth Rock group of companies has sustained steady growth and now write and manage more than $1.5 billion in premiums across the Northeast. As a fast-growing company in a tightly regulated industry tasked with managing large troves of customer data, Plymouth Rock places a special emphasis on strong cybersecurity. However, as the company grew, it faced increasing security threats and needed more sophistication and support with identifying threats and prioritizing risk. Despite having a committed team working hard to ensure the company’s critical assets remain secure and utilizing tools from vendors to identify and mitigate threats, the company needed additional support to identify exposures from misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and human error.
Case Study
Kettering Health Enhances IT Security with XM Cyber Amidst COVID-19 Challenges
Kettering Health, a healthcare network supporting 13 medical centers, over 120 outpatient locations, and more than 30,000 users, was in the process of implementing layered defenses and aligning with NIST security controls when an aggressive rollout of the EPIC Electronic Health Records system fully consumed all IT resources. This resulted in a stall in cyber hygiene activities, leading to configuration drift. The situation was further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced the IT staff to pivot from routine maintenance to address new security challenges presented by a mobile and remote workforce of first responders. The complexity of the situation, coupled with scarce resources, made it difficult to reestablish cyber hygiene. Limited visibility into the status of security tools, time-consuming manual analysis, and an overwhelmed IT network team further complicated the situation.